Journal of Analytical Psychology

1.5k papers and 8.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (739 papers), Social Psychology (555 papers) and General Psychology (329 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (659 papers), Jungian Analytical Psychology (342 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (329 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Analytical Psychology are Margaret Wilkinson, Ladson Hinton, Marcus West, Michael Fordham, Jean Knox, Warren Colman, Christian Rœsler, Joy Schaverien, Alfred Plaut and Andrew Samuels.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Analytical Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Analytical Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Analytical Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Analytical Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025