Conservation Letters

1.1k papers and 52.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Conservation Letters in the last decades have received a total of 52.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Conservation Letters usually cover Global and Planetary Change (596 papers), Ecology (575 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (300 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (314 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (272 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Conservation Letters are Lian Pin Koh, David S. Wilcove, Hugh P. Possingham, David B. Lindenmayer, E.J. Milner‐Gulland, Thomas Cherico Wanger, Andrew R. Mahon, David M. Lodge, Christopher L. Jerde and Douglas C. MacMillan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Conservation Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Conservation Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Conservation Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Conservation Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Conservation Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Conservation Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025