Journal of Substance Abuse

445 papers and 20.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 445 papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse in the last decades have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse usually cover Epidemiology (250 papers), Clinical Psychology (114 papers) and General Health Professions (108 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (229 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (88 papers) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Substance Abuse are Deborah A. Dawson, Bridget F. Grant, Bridget F. Grant, Kate B. Carey, Brian Borsari, Thomas C. Harford, Tom K. Greenfield, Carlo C. DiClemente, Robin Room and Sheryl O. Hughes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Substance Abuse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Substance Abuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Substance Abuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Substance Abuse more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025