Computer Law & Security Report

507 papers and 3.4k indexed citations

About

The 507 papers published in Computer Law & Security Report in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Computer Law & Security Report usually cover Law (163 papers), Political Science and International Relations (145 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (103 papers) specifically the topics of Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (82 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (64 papers) and Copyright and Intellectual Property (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Law & Security Report are Bruce Schneier, Andrés Guadamuz, Yves Poullet, Lee A. Bygrave, Mark Watts, Patrick Riley, Lucas Bergkamp, Mark Powell, Mark Turner and Viktor Mayer‐Schönberger.

In The Last Decade

Computer Law & Security Report

320 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Computer Law & Security Report

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Law & Security Report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Law & Security Report.

Countries where authors publish in Computer Law & Security Report

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Law & Security Report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Law & Security Report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Law & Security Report more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026