AJOB Neuroscience

598 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 598 papers published in AJOB Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in AJOB Neuroscience usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (370 papers), Clinical Psychology (126 papers) and Neurology (115 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (281 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (106 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AJOB Neuroscience are Frédéric Gilbert, Scott Vrecko, Hanna Pickard, Veljko Dubljević, Jean Decety, Jason M. Cowell, Sara Goering, Eran Klein, John R. Shook and Neil Levy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AJOB Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AJOB Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AJOB Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in AJOB Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AJOB Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AJOB Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AJOB Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025