Mark Watts
Impact in
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
- Media Studies and Communication
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
-
- Media Influence and Politics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Climate Change Communication and Perception
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 5
- Policy Transfer and Learning 1
-
- Media Studies and Communication 4
- Social Media and Politics 4
- Co-authors
- David P. Fan (6 shared papers)Dhavan V. Shah (6 shared papers)David Domke (5 shared papers)Ronald J. Faber (1 shared paper)Steven S. Smith (1 shared paper)Byers W. Shaw (1 shared paper)Karen Manley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Communication Research (1 paper)The Journal of Politics (1 paper)Nature Climate Change (1 paper)Journal of Communication (1 paper)Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Watts
11 papers receiving 728 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Communication 464
- Sociology and Political Science 416
- Political Science and International Relations 196
- General Social Sciences 21
- Strategy and Management 76
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Watts
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Watts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Watts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Watts. The network helps show where Mark Watts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mark Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 226 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 175 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 95 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 51 | |
| 9 | Pharmaceuticals and Australia's knowledge economy | 1998 | 3 |
| 10 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 11 | Reasonably appropriate and adapted?: Assessing proportionality and the 'spectrum' of scrutiny in 'McCloy v New South Wales' | 2016 | 1 |
| 12 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 0 |
About Mark Watts
Mark Watts is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 817 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Media Influence and Politics (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (1 paper), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (1 paper) and Law in Society and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (464 citations), Sociology and Political Science (416 citations), Political Science and International Relations (196 citations), General Social Sciences (21 citations) and Strategy and Management (76 citations). Mark Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David P. Fan, Dhavan V. Shah, David Domke, Ronald J. Faber, Steven S. Smith, Byers W. Shaw and Karen Manley. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Research, The Journal of Politics, Nature Climate Change, Journal of Communication and Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.