Comprehensive physiology

1.3k papers and 56.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Comprehensive physiology in the last decades have received a total of 56.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Comprehensive physiology usually cover Molecular Biology (364 papers), Physiology (341 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (256 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (160 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (113 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comprehensive physiology are Liangyou Rui, John Y.L. Chiang, Christian K. Roberts, James L. Boyer, Frank W. Booth, Matthew J. Laye, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Michele Alves‐Bezerra, David E. Cohen and Bente Klarlund Pedersen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comprehensive physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comprehensive physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comprehensive physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Comprehensive physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comprehensive physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comprehensive physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comprehensive physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025