Collection Management

887 papers and 4.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 887 papers published in Collection Management in the last decades have received a total of 4.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Collection Management usually cover Information Systems (497 papers), Library and Information Sciences (271 papers) and Conservation (96 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (410 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (205 papers) and Library Science and Administration (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Collection Management are Haworth Editorial Submission, Jean‐Pierre V. M. Hérubel, Maurice Β. Line, Judith M. Nixon, Michael Levine‐Clark, Charles W. Bailey, Suzanne M. Ward, Marianne Stowell Bracke, F. W. Lancaster and John M. Budd.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Collection Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Collection Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Collection Management.

Countries where authors publish in Collection Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Collection Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Collection Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Collection Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025