This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Budd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Budd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Budd more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Budd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Budd. The network helps show where John M. Budd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Budd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Budd.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Budd based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Budd. John M. Budd is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Budd, John M., et al.. (2018). Epistemology beyond the brain. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(5). 710–719.2 indexed citations
5.
Budd, John M., et al.. (2013). Disposal of Information Seeking and Retrieval Research: Replacement with a Radical Proposition.. 18(3).2 indexed citations
6.
Budd, John M.. (2013). Scholarly communication's problems: an analysis.. Information Research. 18.2 indexed citations
7.
Budd, John M.. (2004). Relevance: Language, Semantics, Philosophy. Library trends. 52(3). 447–462.21 indexed citations
8.
Budd, John M., et al.. (2002). "Do You Have Any Books On..." An Examination of Public Library Holdings. eYLS (Yale Law School). 41(2).2 indexed citations
9.
Budd, John M.. (2001). Information Seeking in Theory and Practice: Rethinking Public Services in Libraries.. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 40(3). 256–263.12 indexed citations
Raber, Douglas J. & John M. Budd. (1999). Public Images of the Role of Information Technology in Public Libraries: Alternatives and Controversies.. 38(3).1 indexed citations
12.
Budd, John M., et al.. (1998). Phenomena of Retraction. JAMA. 280(3). 296–296.176 indexed citations
13.
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, et al.. (1995). An investigation of the use of an online catalog : user characteristics and transaction log analysis. Library Resources and Technical Services. 39(2). 142–152.12 indexed citations
14.
Budd, John M., et al.. (1994). Education for Collection Management: Results of a Survey of Educators and Practitioners.. Library Resources and Technical Services. 38(4).5 indexed citations
15.
Budd, John M.. (1991). The Utility of a Recommended Core List: An Examination of "Books for College Libraries, 3rd Ed.".. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 17(3).7 indexed citations
16.
Budd, John M.. (1989). Information Transfer and Scholarship: The Impact of the Peters and Ceci Paper.. Library & Information Science Research. 11(4).2 indexed citations
17.
Budd, John M.. (1989). It's Not the Principle, It's the Money of the Thing.. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 15(4).1 indexed citations
18.
Budd, John M.. (1986). Characteristics of Written Scholarship in American Literature: A Citation Study.. Library & Information Science Research. 8(2). 189–211.25 indexed citations
19.
Budd, John M. & David G. Robinson. (1986). Enrollment and the Future of Academic Libraries.. Library journal. 111(15). 43–46.3 indexed citations
20.
Budd, John M., et al.. (1982). Measures of User Evaluation at Two Academic Libraries: Prolegomena.. 4(1). 71–84.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.