Cognitive Neuroscience

341 papers and 6.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 341 papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (288 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 papers) and Social Psychology (66 papers) specifically the topics of Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (122 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (80 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognitive Neuroscience are Victor A. F. Lamme, Anil K. Seth, Georg Northoff, Karl Friston, Jie Sui, Jamie Ward, Scott D. Slotnick, Glyn W. Humphreys, Thomas Schenk and Robert D. McIntosh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Cognitive Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognitive Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognitive Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognitive Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025