Thomas Schenk

5.3k total citations
138 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Thomas Schenk is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Hematology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Schenk has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 76 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 papers in Hematology and 17 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Schenk's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (53 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (39 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (25 papers). Thomas Schenk is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (53 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (39 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (25 papers). Thomas Schenk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Austria. Thomas Schenk's co-authors include Daniel T. Smith, Georg Kerkhoff, Robert D. McIntosh, Constanze Hesse, Amanda Ellison, Keira Ball, Paul La Rosée, A. David Milner, John J. Brems and Andreas Hochhaus and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Blood and Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Schenk

132 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Schenk Germany 31 1.8k 478 446 397 274 138 3.2k
Michiyuki Kawakami Japan 29 406 0.2× 79 0.2× 150 0.3× 246 0.6× 165 0.6× 162 2.4k
Alessandro Serra United States 22 213 0.1× 65 0.1× 288 0.6× 111 0.3× 314 1.1× 71 3.0k
John H. Thompson United States 21 810 0.4× 275 0.6× 88 0.2× 85 0.2× 216 0.8× 44 2.4k
Jürg Kesselring Switzerland 31 214 0.1× 444 0.9× 330 0.7× 55 0.1× 103 0.4× 122 3.6k
Toshio Moritani United States 34 441 0.2× 24 0.1× 236 0.5× 74 0.2× 432 1.6× 126 3.8k
Christian J. Lueck Australia 27 1.8k 1.0× 29 0.1× 232 0.5× 210 0.5× 213 0.8× 127 3.5k
Gianluca Campana Italy 29 1.8k 1.0× 37 0.1× 188 0.4× 209 0.5× 173 0.6× 97 2.8k
Yuen T. So United States 29 300 0.2× 28 0.1× 333 0.7× 104 0.3× 887 3.2× 65 3.4k
Enrico Marchioni Italy 30 306 0.2× 64 0.1× 376 0.8× 19 0.0× 96 0.4× 122 2.6k
Laura Mendozzi Italy 27 247 0.1× 102 0.2× 153 0.3× 63 0.2× 83 0.3× 66 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schenk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schenk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schenk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schenk. The network helps show where Thomas Schenk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Schenk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Schenk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Schenk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Schenk. Thomas Schenk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ludwig, Karin, et al.. (2024). Binocular rivalry reveals differential face processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Schenk, Thomas, Thomas Ernst, Ulf Schnetzke, et al.. (2024). Lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (LA-HLH): a scoping review unveils clinical and diagnostic patterns of a lymphoma subgroup with poor prognosis. Leukemia. 38(2). 235–249. 16 indexed citations
3.
Schenk, Thomas, et al.. (2023). The role of habitual learning in premotor attention allocation. Journal of Vision. 23(5). 19–19. 2 indexed citations
4.
Karnath, Hans‐Otto, Thomas Schenk, Thomas Benke, et al.. (2023). Kurzfassung der S2k-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie von Neglect und anderen Störungen der Raumkognition“ (AWMF-030/126). Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie. 34(3). 119–128. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rinke, Jenny, Vivien Schäfer, Thomas Schenk, et al.. (2022). ASXL1 mutations predict inferior molecular response to nilotinib treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 36(9). 2242–2249. 25 indexed citations
6.
Birndt, Sebastian, Thomas Schenk, Frank M. Brunkhorst, et al.. (2020). Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: collaborative analysis of 137 cases of a nationwide German registry. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 146(4). 1065–1077. 69 indexed citations
7.
8.
Schenk, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Grasping and perception are both affected by irrelevant information and secondary tasks: new evidence from the Garner paradigm. Psychological Research. 84(5). 1269–1283. 5 indexed citations
9.
Becker, Linda, Daniel T. Smith, & Thomas Schenk. (2017). Investigating the familiarity effect in texture segmentation by means of event-related brain potentials. Vision Research. 140. 120–132. 4 indexed citations
10.
Utz, Kathrin S., et al.. (2015). Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber’s law. Vision Research. 111(Pt A). 22–30. 38 indexed citations
11.
Hesse, Constanze, Thomas Schenk, & Heiner Deubel. (2012). Attention is needed for action control: Further evidence from grasping. Vision Research. 71. 37–43. 23 indexed citations
12.
Kerkhoff, Georg & Thomas Schenk. (2012). Rehabilitation of neglect: An update. Neuropsychologia. 50(6). 1072–1079. 156 indexed citations
13.
Ball, Keira, et al.. (2011). Spatial priming in visual search: memory for body-centred information. Experimental Brain Research. 212(3). 477–485. 3 indexed citations
14.
Ball, Keira, Daniel T. Smith, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2010). A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search. Experimental Brain Research. 204(4). 585–594. 16 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Daniel T., Keira Ball, Amanda Ellison, & Thomas Schenk. (2009). Deficits of reflexive attention induced by abduction of the eye. Neuropsychologia. 48(5). 1269–1276. 30 indexed citations
16.
Huzly, Daniela, Thomas Schenk, Wolfgang Jilg, & D. Neumann‐Haefelin. (2008). Comparison of Nine Commercially Available Assays for Quantification of Antibody Response to Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 46(4). 1298–1306. 48 indexed citations
17.
Noble, Adam & Thomas Schenk. (2008). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the family and friends of patients who have suffered spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of neurosurgery. 109(6). 1027–1033. 25 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Daniel T. & Thomas Schenk. (2007). Reflexive attention improves change detection (but only briefly). Perception. 36. 0–0. 1 indexed citations
19.
Schenk, Thomas & John J. Brems. (1998). Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 6(1). 65–72. 73 indexed citations
20.
Kornek, Gabriela, Thomas Schenk, Heinz Ludwig, Michael Hejna, & Werner Scheithauer. (1996). Placebo-Controlled Trial of Medroxy – progesterone Acetate in Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Cachexia. Oncology Research and Treatment. 19(2). 164–168. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michiyuki Kawakami Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alessandro Serra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John H. Thompson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jürg Kesselring Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Toshio Moritani Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christian J. Lueck Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gianluca Campana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yuen T. So Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Enrico Marchioni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura Mendozzi
Rankless by CCL
2026