Ecological Psychology

596 papers and 17.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 596 papers published in Ecological Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Ecological Psychology usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (341 papers), Social Psychology (177 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 papers) specifically the topics of Visual perception and processing mechanisms (124 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (113 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ecological Psychology are Thomas A. Stoffregen, M. T. Turvey, William Gaver, Anthony Chemero, Claire F. Michaels, Harry Heft, Erik Rietveld, Elliot Saltzman, Gary E. Riccio and Julian Kiverstein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ecological Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ecological Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ecological Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Ecological Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ecological Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ecological Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecological Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025