Cogent Arts and Humanities

813 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 813 papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (242 papers), Language and Linguistics (182 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (136 papers) specifically the topics of Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (72 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (67 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cogent Arts and Humanities are Sayeed Naqibullah Orfan, Holi Ibrahim Holi Ali, Ehsan Namaziandost, Sandeep Srivastava, Olívia Fialho, Joanna Krasodomska, Ewelina Zarzycka, Ahmad S. Haider, Jayeon Lee and Arthur W. Frank.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Cogent Arts and Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cogent Arts and Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cogent Arts and Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cogent Arts and Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025