Polish Botanical Journal

493 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 493 papers published in Polish Botanical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Polish Botanical Journal usually cover Plant Science (390 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (352 papers) and Molecular Biology (111 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (300 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (206 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Polish Botanical Journal are Dariusz L. Szlachetko, Lucyna Śliwa, Marcin Piątek, Tamás Pócs, Zbigniew Szeląg, S. Robbert Gradstein, Adam Flakus, Martin Kukwa, Beata Paszko and Stefan Zerbe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Polish Botanical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Polish Botanical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Polish Botanical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Polish Botanical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Polish Botanical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Polish Botanical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polish Botanical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025