Countries where authors publish in Cancer Microenvironment
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cancer Microenvironment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cancer Microenvironment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer Microenvironment more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cancer Microenvironment
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cancer Microenvironment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cancer Microenvironment.
About Cancer Microenvironment
The 218 papers published in Cancer Microenvironment in the last decades have received a total of 9.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Cancer Microenvironment usually cover Oncology (137 papers), Cancer Research (54 papers), Immunology (73 papers), Immunology and Allergy (17 papers) and Biotechnology (13 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Cells and Metastasis (55 papers), Immune cells in cancer (31 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (30 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (23 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (20 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (17 papers), Chemokine receptors and signaling (16 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cancer Microenvironment are Isaac P. Witz, Ronit Vogt Sionov, Zvi G. Fridlender, Zvi Granot, Fernando Vidal‐Vanaclocha, Sytse J. Piersma, Qian Xiao, Gaoxiang Ge, Marco Erreni and Alberto Mantovani.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.