This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oncoscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oncoscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oncoscience more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Oncoscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oncoscience.
About Oncoscience
The 421 papers published in Oncoscience in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Oncoscience usually cover Cancer Research (121 papers), Oncology (162 papers) and Molecular Biology (246 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (36 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (36 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (35 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (35 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (33 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (29 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (26 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oncoscience are Miguel López‐Lázaro, Anne Hamacher‐Brady, Nathan Brady, Nils Eling, John Hazin, Alex Zhavoronkov, Jyotirmaya Behera, Neetu Tyagi, Brad A. Bryan and Clarissa Amaya.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.