Countries where authors publish in Tissue Barriers
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tissue Barriers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tissue Barriers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tissue Barriers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tissue Barriers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tissue Barriers.
About Tissue Barriers
The 368 papers published in Tissue Barriers in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Tissue Barriers usually cover Neurology (145 papers), Immunology and Allergy (26 papers), Cell Biology (55 papers), Molecular Biology (175 papers) and Cancer Research (31 papers) specifically the topics of Barrier Structure and Function Studies (141 papers), Gut microbiota and health (30 papers), Connexins and lens biology (30 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (25 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (22 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (21 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (21 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tissue Barriers are Camila Morales, Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara, Tatiana Takiishi, Alessio Fasano, Craig Sturgeon, Steve Cornick, Kris Chadee, Adelaide Tawiah, D. Neil Granger and Stephen F. Rodrigues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.