Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz

292 papers and 473 indexed citations i.

About

The 292 papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz in the last decades have received a total of 473 indexed citations. Papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz usually cover Anthropology (138 papers), Archeology (108 papers) and History (47 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (132 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (61 papers) and Classical Studies and Legal History (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz are Michel Christol, John Scheid, Dominic Rathbone, Jean‐Marie Bertrand, Catherine Virlouvet, Frédéric Hurlet, Giuseppe Camodeca, Marie-Thérèse Raepsaet-Charlier, Werner Eck and Jonathan Prag.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz.

Countries where authors publish in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025