PSYCHE
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
- Topics
- Psychoanalysis and Social CritiquePsychology, Coaching, and TherapyPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
In The Last Decade
PSYCHE
80 papers receiving 158 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cultural Studies 299
- Clinical Psychology 291
- Social Psychology 215
- Sociology and Political Science 135
- Philosophy 90
Countries where authors publish in PSYCHE
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PSYCHE. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PSYCHE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PSYCHE more than expected).
Fields of papers published in PSYCHE
This network shows the impact of papers published in PSYCHE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PSYCHE.
About PSYCHE
The 319 papers published in PSYCHE in the last decades have received a total of 639 indexed citations . Papers published in PSYCHE usually cover Cultural Studies (176 papers), General Psychology (14 papers) and Social Psychology (96 papers) specifically the topics of Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (175 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (85 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PSYCHE are Werner Bohleber, Étienne Balibar, Vera King, Johannes Picht, Michael B. Buchholz, Donald W. Winnicott, Susan Isaacs, Joachim Küchenhoff, Marianne Leuzinger‐Bohleber and Ulrich Moser.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.