Brontë Studies

288 papers and 195 indexed citations

About

The 288 papers published in Brontë Studies in the last decades have received a total of 195 indexed citations. Papers published in Brontë Studies usually cover Pathology and Forensic Medicine (112 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (90 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (86 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Scientific Studies (112 papers), Ayn Rand and Brontë studies (85 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brontë Studies are Marianne Thormählen, James Phillips, Birgitta Berglund, Lakshmi Krishnan, Andrew J. Abraham, Sandro Jung, Kathryn Sutherland, Maggie Allen, Claire O’Callaghan and Stephen Whitehead.

In The Last Decade

Brontë Studies

94 papers receiving 130 citations

Countries where authors publish in Brontë Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brontë Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brontë Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brontë Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Brontë Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brontë Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brontë Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026