French forum
- Fields
- Literature and Literary Theory (120 papers)History and Philosophy of Science (39 papers)Anthropology (61 papers)
- Topics
- French Literature and Critical TheoryFrench Literature and PoetryFrench Literature and Criticism
In The Last Decade
French forum
93 papers receiving 122 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Literature and Literary Theory 90
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- History 51
- Anthropology 39
- Philosophy 27
Countries where authors publish in French forum
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in French forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in French forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites French forum more than expected).
Fields of papers published in French forum
This network shows the impact of papers published in French forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in French forum.
About French forum
The 241 papers published in French forum in the last decades have received a total of 217 indexed citations . Papers published in French forum usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (120 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (39 papers) and Anthropology (61 papers) specifically the topics of French Literature and Critical Theory (61 papers), French Literature and Poetry (55 papers) and French Literature and Criticism (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in French forum are Panivong Norindr, Warren Motte, Alison James, Richard J. Watts, Suzanne Guerlac, Jan Baetens, Dominic Thomas, Lawrence R. Schehr, Jean-Jacques Thomas and Hassan Melehy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.