Progress in Neurobiology

2.5k papers and 306.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Progress in Neurobiology in the last decades have received a total of 306.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Neurobiology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k papers), Molecular Biology (835 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (652 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (643 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (270 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (194 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Neurobiology are Mark J. Millan, Niels C. Danbolt, Jonathan W. Mink, Morten L. Kringelbach, Ralf Dringen, Thomas Tzschentke, Edmund T. Rolls, Dick R. Nässel, Michael Koch and Brian H. Bland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Neurobiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Neurobiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Neurobiology.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Neurobiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Neurobiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Neurobiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Neurobiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025