Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

2.3k papers and 253.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society in the last decades have received a total of 253.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (736 papers), Ecology (685 papers) and Molecular Biology (424 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (352 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (298 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society are P. J. Grubb, George A. Parker, Peter Mitchell, Shinichi Nakagawa, Michael D. Jennions, Stephen Jay Gould, Marion Petrie, Ulrika Candolin, Innes C. Cuthill and Douglas S. Glazier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Countries where authors publish in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025