George A. Parker

43.1k total citations · 15 hit papers
309 papers, 30.6k citations indexed

About

George A. Parker is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, George A. Parker has authored 309 papers receiving a total of 30.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 132 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 77 papers in Genetics and 48 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in George A. Parker's work include Plant and animal studies (104 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (87 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (47 papers). George A. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (104 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (87 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (47 papers). George A. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. George A. Parker's co-authors include John Maynard Smith, Matthew J. G. Gage, T. H. Clutton‐Brock, Douglas W. Mock, Leigh W. Simmons, Paula Stockley, Michael Ball, Michael Begon, Tim Clutton‐Brock and Nina Wedell and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

George A. Parker

306 papers receiving 28.5k citations

Hit Papers

SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS... 1970 2026 1988 2007 1970 1974 1976 2002 1997 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k 2.5k

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
George A. Parker 20.3k 9.8k 7.5k 3.6k 3.3k 309 30.6k
Eric L. Charnov 12.8k 0.6× 5.9k 0.6× 11.9k 1.6× 8.1k 2.2× 2.7k 0.8× 165 30.5k
Leigh W. Simmons 17.4k 0.9× 10.3k 1.0× 3.5k 0.5× 1.9k 0.5× 684 0.2× 417 22.8k
Michael D. Jennions 12.6k 0.6× 5.6k 0.6× 4.5k 0.6× 2.5k 0.7× 994 0.3× 244 18.7k
William R. Rice 13.2k 0.7× 17.8k 1.8× 9.0k 1.2× 6.3k 1.7× 1.0k 0.3× 117 31.5k
Anders Pape Møller 31.3k 1.5× 7.2k 0.7× 28.6k 3.8× 6.2k 1.7× 1.0k 0.3× 863 52.4k
John A. Endler 18.8k 0.9× 8.9k 0.9× 8.4k 1.1× 5.9k 1.6× 789 0.2× 186 28.5k
Hanna Kokko 11.7k 0.6× 6.0k 0.6× 7.0k 0.9× 2.5k 0.7× 2.1k 0.7× 352 19.8k
Tim Clutton‐Brock 17.5k 0.9× 9.4k 1.0× 18.3k 2.4× 3.7k 1.0× 3.5k 1.1× 340 35.4k
Stephen C. Stearns 6.9k 0.3× 5.0k 0.5× 6.9k 0.9× 4.9k 1.4× 1.2k 0.4× 135 18.9k
Russell Lande 24.5k 1.2× 22.7k 2.3× 14.5k 1.9× 12.7k 3.5× 3.2k 1.0× 215 49.2k

Countries citing papers authored by George A. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George A. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George A. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George A. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George A. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George A. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George A. Parker. The network helps show where George A. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George A. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George A. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George A. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George A. Parker. George A. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Togashi, Tatsuya, et al.. (2024). An ulvophycean marine green alga produces large parthenogenetic isogametes as predicted by the gamete dynamics model for the evolution of anisogamy. Biology Letters. 20(10). 20240489–20240489. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lehtonen, Jussi, George A. Parker, & Camilla M. Whittington. (2024). The logic of conventional and reversed Bateman gradients. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 291(2034). 20242126–20242126. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lehtonen, Jussi & George A. Parker. (2024). The correlation between anisogamy and sexual selection intensity—the broad theoretical predictions. Evolution Letters. 8(6). 749–755. 4 indexed citations
4.
Togashi, Tatsuya, et al.. (2023). Mitochondrial uniparental inheritance achieved after fertilization challenges the nuclear–cytoplasmic conflict hypothesis for anisogamy evolution. Biology Letters. 19(9). 20230352–20230352. 2 indexed citations
5.
Vidal, Justin D., Karyn Colman, Manoj Bhaskaran, et al.. (2021). Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Best Practices: Documentation of Sexual Maturity by Microscopic Evaluation in Nonclinical Safety Studies. Toxicologic Pathology. 49(5). 977–989. 5 indexed citations
6.
Benesh, Daniel P., George A. Parker, & James C. Chubb. (2021). Life‐cycle complexity in helminths: What are the benefits?. Evolution. 75(8). 1936–1952. 24 indexed citations
7.
Parker, George A., Victoria Zarotsky, Wendy J. Carman, et al.. (2013). The Prevalence, Incidence, And Treatment Rates Of Hypogonadism In Men Across Geographies: A Systematic Literature Review. Value in Health. 16(3). A70–A71. 4 indexed citations
8.
Immler, Simone, Scott Pitnick, George A. Parker, et al.. (2011). Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(13). 5325–5330. 144 indexed citations
9.
Parker, George A.. (2007). Geoff A. Parker. Current Biology. 17(4). R111–R112. 1 indexed citations
10.
Schütz, Dolores, George A. Parker, Michael Taborsky, & Tetsu Sato. (2006). An optimality approach to male and female body sizes in an extremely size-dimorphic cichlid fish. Evolutionary ecology research. 8(8). 1393–1408. 26 indexed citations
11.
Parker, George A., et al.. (2005). Mouse model of docetaxel neurotoxicity. Cancer Research. 65. 984–985. 1 indexed citations
12.
Gage, Matthew J. G., et al.. (2004). Spermatozoal Traits and Sperm Competition in Atlantic Salmon. Current Biology. 14(1). 44–47. 479 indexed citations
13.
Royle, Nick J., Ian R. Hartley, & George A. Parker. (2002). Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 17(9). 434–440. 207 indexed citations
14.
Hagerty, D. J., et al.. (1997). The Need for Research on Scour at Bridge Crossings. 1020–1020. 7 indexed citations
15.
Mock, Douglas W. & George A. Parker. (1997). The Evolution of Sibling Rivalry. 785 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Lefbom, Bonnie K. & George A. Parker. (1995). Ataxia associated with lymphosarcoma in a dog. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 207(7). 922–923. 4 indexed citations
17.
Clutton‐Brock, T. H. & George A. Parker. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour. 49(5). 1345–1365. 593 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Parker, George A.. (1986). Comprehensive Textbook on Oncology. Annals of Surgery. 204(5). 608. 4 indexed citations
19.
Parker, George A.. (1982). Fundamentals in Cancer Management. Annals of Surgery. 196(5). 616. 3 indexed citations
20.
Parker, George A.. (1980). International Advances in Surgical Oncology. Annals of Surgery. 192(5). 699. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026