Countries where authors publish in BioChip Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BioChip Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BioChip Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BioChip Journal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in BioChip Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BioChip Journal.
About BioChip Journal
The 723 papers published in BioChip Journal in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in BioChip Journal usually cover Biomedical Engineering (383 papers), Molecular Biology (350 papers) and Bioengineering (26 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (151 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (130 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (116 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (105 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (91 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (86 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (79 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BioChip Journal are Jonghee Yoon, Aram J. Chung, Nae Yoon Lee, Min Park, Hong Nam Kim, Hyun C. Yoon, Heon‐Ho Jeong, Moon Il Kim, Sungsu Park and Ki‐Hun Jeong.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.