Countries where authors publish in Nano Convergence
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nano Convergence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nano Convergence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nano Convergence more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nano Convergence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nano Convergence.
About Nano Convergence
The 503 papers published in Nano Convergence in the last decades have received a total of 18.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Nano Convergence usually cover Biomedical Engineering (198 papers), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (79 papers), Materials Chemistry (193 papers), Structural Biology (5 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (173 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (47 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (36 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (32 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (31 papers), Graphene research and applications (30 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (30 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (29 papers) and Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (28 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nano Convergence are Chuan‐Jian Zhong, Shan Wang, Aolin Lu, Hemant Kumar Daima, P. N. Navya, Prashant Shekhar, Zubin Jacob, Junsuk Rho, Young Jik Kwon and Nam‐Gyu Park.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.