Australian Health Review

2.4k papers and 27.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Australian Health Review in the last decades have received a total of 27.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Health Review usually cover General Health Professions (1.3k papers), Economics and Econometrics (468 papers) and Emergency Medical Services (454 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (426 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (337 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (320 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Health Review are Don Hindle, Sharon Mickan, Stephen Duckett, Terry Mills, Ian Scott, Theo Vos, Colin Mathers, Duncan Boldy, Diann Eley and Jennifer Moffatt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Health Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Health Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Health Review.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Health Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Health Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Health Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Health Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025