Countries where authors publish in Australian aboriginal studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian aboriginal studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian aboriginal studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian aboriginal studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Australian aboriginal studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian aboriginal studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian aboriginal studies.
About Australian aboriginal studies
The 563 papers published in Australian aboriginal studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Australian aboriginal studies usually cover Archeology (36 papers), Anthropology (176 papers) and Health (156 papers) specifically the topics of Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (154 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (94 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian aboriginal studies are Lawrence Bamblett, Martin Nakata, Beth Gott, Alan Watchman, Michael Dodson, Gillian Cowlishaw, Geoffrey Gray, Bronwyn Fredericks, Colin Tatz and Allan Marett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.