Replace Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions with:
Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsNetherlands
Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeChina
International Journal of Management ReviewsUnited Kingdom
Journal of Consumer PolicyUnited States
The Journal of Marketing Theory and PracticeUnited States
Business Ethics A European ReviewUnited Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of ManagementSweden
Journal of Economic GeographyUnited Kingdom
Academy of Management AnnalsUnited States
Journal of Supply Chain ManagementUnited States
Environmental Innovation and Societal TransitionsNetherlandsView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Organization & Environment
Organization & Environment · 1×
×0.55.9kSM
×0.44.9kMARKE
×1.39.3kSPS
×0.73.0kMMPL
×1.97.3kEE
Citations per year, relative to Organization & Environment
Organization & Environment · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Organization & Environment
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Organization & Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Organization & Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organization & Environment more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Organization & Environment
This network shows the impact of papers published in Organization & Environment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Organization & Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.