Countries where authors publish in Architectural History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Architectural History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Architectural History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Architectural History more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Architectural History
This network shows the impact of papers published in Architectural History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Architectural History.
About Architectural History
The 482 papers published in Architectural History in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Architectural History usually cover Museology (120 papers), Architecture (49 papers) and History (228 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Architecture and Urbanism (129 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (119 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Architectural History are Qinghua Guo, Howard Colvin, T. A. Heslop, Mark Girouard, Peter Draper, Jean‐Louis Cohen, J. Mordaunt Crook, Deborah Howard, Adrian Forty and John Newman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.