Arbor

1.5k papers and 3.6k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Arbor in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Arbor usually cover Sociology and Political Science (274 papers), History (208 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (155 papers) specifically the topics of Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (97 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (86 papers) and History of Education in Spain (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arbor are Mario Dı́az, Antonio Aledo, Adrián Aguilera, Rafael Mata Olmo, Luis Enrique Alonso Benito, Xavier Torrebadella Flix, J. L. Mateo, José Antonio Caride Gómez, Igor Sádaba Rodríguez and Antonio Bolívar Botía.

In The Last Decade

Arbor

884 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Arbor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arbor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arbor.

Countries where authors publish in Arbor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arbor. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arbor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arbor more than expected).

La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina 1993 2026 2004 2015 73
  1. La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina (1993)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026