Applied Psycholinguistics

1.6k papers and 51.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics in the last decades have received a total of 51.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.3k papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (689 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (354 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (912 papers), Language Development and Disorders (764 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (598 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Psycholinguistics are Heinz Wimmer, Susan E. Gathercole, Laurence B. Leonard, Elinor Saiegh‐Haddad, Claudia Felser, Annick De Houwer, Johanne Paradis, Barbara Zurer Pearson, Joanne F. Carlisle and Hollis S. Scarborough.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Psycholinguistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Psycholinguistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Psycholinguistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Psycholinguistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025