Replace Journal of Safety Science and Resilience with:
Journal of Safety Science and ResilienceChina
Transportation EngineeringItaly
Spill Science & Technology BulletinUnited States
Journal of Fire Protection EngineeringUnited States
Protection and Control of Modern Power SystemsChina
Journal of Modern TransportationChina
Journal of Marine Engineering & TechnologyUnited Kingdom
Journal of Sustainable MiningPoland
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical EngineeringUnited States
Transportation Safety and EnvironmentChina
Journal of Safety Science and ResilienceChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Applied Fire Science
Journal of Applied Fire Science · 1×
×0.3307SRRQ
×0.4239OE
×2.1479GPC
×0.8180CSE
×0.6119EE
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Applied Fire Science
Journal of Applied Fire Science · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Fire Science
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Fire Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Fire Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Fire Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Fire Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Fire Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Fire Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.