Ruth C. Newberry
- Small Animals top 0.01%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 0.05%
- Genetics top 2%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Inma EstévezMarek ŠpinkaD.G.M. Wood-GushSylvie CloutierMarc BekoffLinda KeelingE. E. GardinerJohn W. Hall
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (69 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (57 papers)Livestock and Poultry Management (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayCanada
In The Last Decade
Ruth C. Newberry
107 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Small Animals 3.4k
- Animal Science and Zoology 3.1k
- Genetics 1.2k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 702
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth C. Newberry
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth C. Newberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth C. Newberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth C. Newberry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth C. Newberry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth C. Newberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth C. Newberry. The network helps show where Ruth C. Newberry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth C. Newberry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth C. Newberry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth C. Newberry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth C. Newberry. Ruth C. Newberry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 153 | |
| 13 | Gestion des poules de réforme | 1 |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Broiler chickens: a tolerant social system? | 115 |
| 16 | The space-time continuum, and its relevance to farm animals | 13 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 129 | |
| 20 | 143 |
About Ruth C. Newberry
Ruth C. Newberry is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Developmental Biology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (69 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (57 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (3.4k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (3.1k citations) and Developmental Biology (334 citations). Ruth C. Newberry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Inma Estévez, Marek Špinka, D.G.M. Wood-Gush, Sylvie Cloutier, Marc Bekoff, Linda Keeling, E. E. Gardiner, John W. Hall, J.R. Hunt and Janice Swanson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.