Annals of Actuarial Science

299 papers and 2.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 299 papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science usually cover Demography (163 papers), Economics and Econometrics (112 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (105 papers) specifically the topics of Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (160 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (76 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Actuarial Science are Leonie Tickle, Heather Booth, Ronald Richman, Mario V. Wüthrich, David Dickson, Jackie Li, Richard Verrall, David Pitt, A. D. Wilkie and Peter D. England.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Actuarial Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Actuarial Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Actuarial Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Actuarial Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025