Asian Journal of Women s Studies

618 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 618 papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (318 papers), Gender Studies (225 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (143 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Politics and Representation (96 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (50 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Journal of Women s Studies are Nadine Graham, Nicola Piper, Zhongxuan Lin, Laura Hyun Yi Kang, Liu Yang, Marilyn Porter, Cynthia Enloe, Min Chul Kim, Youngmi Kim and Carmen Luke.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Journal of Women s Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Journal of Women s Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Journal of Women s Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025