Annals of Functional Analysis

612 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 612 papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis usually cover Applied Mathematics (432 papers), Mathematical Physics (329 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (176 papers) specifically the topics of Holomorphic and Operator Theory (175 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (143 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Functional Analysis are Zoubir Dahmani, Krzysztof Ciepliński, Kais Feki, Bessem Samet, Calogero Vetro, Emrah Evren Kara, Fuad Kıttaneh, Metin Başarır, Frank Hansen and Mansoor Saburov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Functional Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Functional Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Functional Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Functional Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025