Asian Economic Policy Review

742 papers and 4.7k indexed citations

About

The 742 papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (336 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (273 papers) and Finance (179 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (154 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (140 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Economic Policy Review are Takatoshi Ito, Hal Hill, Ken Itakura, Marcus Noland, Fukunari Kimura, Shujiro Urata, Jocelyn E. Finlay, David E. Bloom, Yiping Huang and Chalongphob Sussangkarn.

In The Last Decade

Asian Economic Policy Review

526 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Economic Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Economic Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Economic Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Economic Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026