Asian-Pacific Economic Literature

466 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 466 papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature usually cover Economics and Econometrics (186 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (172 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (89 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (126 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (64 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature are Mohamed Ariff, Hal Hill, Prema‐chandra Athukorala, C. Peter Timmer, John L. Enos, J. A. C. Mackie, Mike Hobday, Ross Garnaut, Yiping Huang and Peter Warr.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature.

Countries where authors publish in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian-Pacific Economic Literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025