Asian Development Review

485 papers and 5.0k indexed citations

About

The 485 papers published in Asian Development Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Development Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (193 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (140 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (99 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (101 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (72 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Development Review are Amartya Sen, Nanak Kakwani, Ifzal Ali, Ernesto M. Pernia, Hyun H. Son, Hal Hill, Matthieu Clément, Susan Horton, T. N. Srinivasan and M. G. Quibria.

In The Last Decade

Asian Development Review

383 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Countries where authors publish in Asian Development Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Development Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Development Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Development Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Asian Development Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Development Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Development Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026