Countries where authors publish in Asian Economic Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Economic Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Economic Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Economic Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Asian Economic Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Economic Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Economic Journal.
About Asian Economic Journal
The 618 papers published in Asian Economic Journal in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Asian Economic Journal usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (243 papers), Economics and Econometrics (337 papers) and Finance (115 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (155 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (98 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (83 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (61 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (59 papers), International Business and FDI (47 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (44 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Economic Journal are Mansor H. Ibrahim, Ahmad Zubaidi Baharumshah, Xin Meng, Eric D. Ramstetter, Thiam Hee Ng, Renato Villano, Asep Suryahadi, Sudarno Sumarto, Euan Fleming and Linda Yueh.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.