Administrative Sciences

1.5k papers and 13.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Administrative Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Administrative Sciences usually cover Strategy and Management (444 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (421 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (339 papers) specifically the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (225 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (183 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Administrative Sciences are Michael J. Magro, Dag Øivind Madsen, Jacob Hörisch, Sheri Price, Michael Gerlich, Barry Z. Posner, Simone Pizzi, Ezgi Erkmen, V. Susan Dahinten and Ontario S. Wooden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Administrative Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Administrative Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Administrative Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Administrative Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Administrative Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Administrative Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Administrative Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026