Countries where authors publish in Acta Ornithologica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Ornithologica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Ornithologica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Ornithologica more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Ornithologica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Ornithologica.
About Acta Ornithologica
The 765 papers published in Acta Ornithologica in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Acta Ornithologica usually cover Ecology (596 papers), Ecological Modeling (89 papers) and Developmental Biology (35 papers) specifically the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (448 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (213 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (207 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (130 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (117 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (105 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (90 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Ornithologica are Tomasz Wesołowski, Ludwik Tomiałojć, Tomasz D. Mazgajski, Wiesław Walankiewicz, Dorota Czeszczewik, Jiří Reif, Łukasz Rejt, Piotr Tryjanowski, Cezary Mitrus and Andrzej Dyrcz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.