Acta Biotheoretica

1.0k papers and 16.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Acta Biotheoretica in the last decades have received a total of 16.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Biotheoretica usually cover Molecular Biology (257 papers), Genetics (213 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (124 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (137 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (120 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Biotheoretica are Stephen D. Fretwell, H. L. Lucas, P. J. den Boer, Hans Heesterbeek, Maureen A. O’Malley, Teuvo Kohonen, John M. McNamara, Carlo Ricotta, Alasdair I. Houston and Robert Gittins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Biotheoretica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Biotheoretica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Biotheoretica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Biotheoretica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Biotheoretica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Biotheoretica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Biotheoretica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025