Wildlife Society Bulletin

About

The 539 papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 15.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin usually cover Ecology (450 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (118 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (87 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (318 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (186 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wildlife Society Bulletin are Jeff Jenness, William L. Baker, Paul R. Krausman, Kerry L. Nicholson, Fred B. Samson, Fritz L. Knopf, James W. Cain, Steven S. Rosenstock, Kurt C. VerCauteren and Luis J. Villanueva-Rivera.

In The Last Decade

Wildlife Society Bulletin

519 papers receiving 13.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Wildlife Society Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wildlife Society Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wildlife Society Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wildlife Society Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026