Accounts of Materials Research

542 papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 542 papers published in Accounts of Materials Research in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Accounts of Materials Research usually cover Materials Chemistry (279 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (180 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (131 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (43 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (43 papers) and Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounts of Materials Research are Ruofei Zhang, Kelong Fan, Xiyun Yan, Matthew R. Ryder, Penghao Li, J. Fraser Stoddart, Long Jiao, Jingxue Wang, Hai‐Long Jiang and Guihua Yu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Accounts of Materials Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounts of Materials Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounts of Materials Research.

Countries where authors publish in Accounts of Materials Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounts of Materials Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounts of Materials Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounts of Materials Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025