University of Michigan

18.3M citations
374.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Michigan

277.2k papers receiving 12.6M citations

Peers

University of Michigan
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 395.1k
  • Molecular Biology 929.9k
  • Aging 18.0k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 420.9k
  • Health 105.1k
Replace University of Toronto with:
University of Toronto Canada
University of Chicago United States
University of Pittsburgh United States
Northwestern University United States
University of Wisconsin–Madison United States
The Ohio State University United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
Cornell University United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
University of Michigan relative to University of Toronto Canada University of Toronto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
University of Toronto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Michigan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Michigan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Michigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Michigan more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Michigan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Michigan at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Michigan at the time of their publication.

About University of Michigan

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Michigan have published 374.4k papers, which have received a total of 18.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 8.6k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2.4k papers in Health, 8.6k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 15.3k papers in Molecular Biology and 3.5k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.8k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1.4k papers), Innovations in Medical Education (1.2k papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1.2k papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1.1k papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1.1k papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1.1k papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.0k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (395.1k citations), Molecular Biology (929.9k citations), Aging (18.0k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (420.9k citations) and Health (105.1k citations). Authors at University of Michigan collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Astrophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Physical Review Letters. Some of University of Michigan's most productive authors include Mark E. J. Newman, Claes Fornell, Fred D. Davis, David F. Larcker, Richard P. Bagozzi, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Ronald C. Kessler, Daniel J. Klionsky, Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Kent C. Berridge.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact