University of Liverpool

4.0M citations
127.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Liverpool

111.6k papers receiving 3.5M citations

Peers

University of Liverpool
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Equine 16.3k
  • Infectious Diseases 166.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 182.8k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 93.0k
  • Molecular Biology 452.4k
Replace University of Bristol with:
University of Bristol United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh United Kingdom
University of Glasgow United Kingdom
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
University of Cambridge United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of London United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
Newcastle University United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
University of Liverpool relative to University of Bristol United Kingdom University of Bristol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
University of Bristol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Liverpool

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Liverpool. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Liverpool with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Liverpool more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Liverpool

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Liverpool at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Liverpool at the time of their publication.

About University of Liverpool

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Liverpool have published 127.9k papers, which have received a total of 4.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 696 papers in Equine, 4.9k papers in Infectious Diseases, 3.5k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1.8k papers in Small Animals and 5.8k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.8k papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1.4k papers), Nuclear physics research studies (1.4k papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1.3k papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (1.3k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1.2k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.0k papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (987 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Equine (16.3k citations), Infectious Diseases (166.4k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (182.8k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (93.0k citations) and Molecular Biology (452.4k citations). Authors at University of Liverpool collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Lancet, Nature, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Liverpool's most productive authors include George A. Parker, J.P. Riley, Andrew Cooper, Jennifer E. Murphy, Robin Dunbar, Munir Pirmohamed, Robert D. Burgoyne, Constant M.G. van den Berg, John Garthwaite and Julian E. Besag.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact