University of Bristol

5.6M citations
128.6k papers ·

Impact in

  • Paleontology top 0.05%
    • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
    • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
    • Cryospheric studies and observations

Papers in

University of Bristol

113.6k papers receiving 5.0M citations

Peers

University of Bristol
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Paleontology 124.2k
  • Atmospheric Science 263.0k
  • Geophysics 164.1k
  • Small Animals 77.9k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 188.8k
Replace University of Oxford with:
University of Oxford United Kingdom
University of Cambridge United Kingdom
University College London United Kingdom
University of Edinburgh United Kingdom
Imperial College London United Kingdom
University of Liverpool United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
Utrecht University Netherlands
University of Glasgow United Kingdom
University of Bristol relative to University of Oxford United Kingdom University of Oxford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Oxford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Bristol

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Bristol. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Bristol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Bristol more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Bristol

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Bristol at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Bristol at the time of their publication.

About University of Bristol

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Bristol have published 128.6k papers, which have received a total of 5.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.8k papers in Paleontology, 575 papers in Equine, 2.3k papers in Small Animals, 5.3k papers in Atmospheric Science and 510 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2.3k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.8k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.7k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.4k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (1.4k papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (1.2k papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1.1k papers) and Plant and animal studies (1.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (124.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (263.0k citations), Geophysics (164.1k citations), Small Animals (77.9k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (188.8k citations). Authors at University of Bristol collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Nature, BMJ Open, Scientific Reports and The Lancet. Some of University of Bristol's most productive authors include George Davey Smith, Matthias Egger, Andrew P. Halestrap, Douglas G. Altman, Jonathan A C Sterne, Peter Christian Gøtzsche, Martin Schneider, R. Hill, Julian P. T. Higgins and Michael Berry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact