Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
- Authors
- Satish Joshi
- Journal
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1162/108819899569449 →Countries where authors are citing Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
This network shows the impact of Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques.
About Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
This paper, published in 1999, received 445 indexed citations . Written by Satish Joshi covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Engineering (336 citations), Strategy and Management (90 citations) and Building and Construction (84 citations). Published in Journal of Industrial Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1162/108819899569449.